Snooze Alarm

Something about Romney and...
(T M I)

These are not actually the stuff of dreams or my AM snoozing, but if President Obama were half as frightening as the right would have him, the left and the middle would be more content.***

[Not Exactly]

Dirty Harry and Fake My Day:  Rachel Maddow nails Romney on lastest ad that*...

...can't be put into words.   Maybe** a Mitt Sand Witch or Which.  Well... three words.  Frackin', fudgin', in-F-able!  Or goose the gander.  I will hold off on the links for now.  One word is waver, or "cul de sac" of politics.  Another is "running".  For what?(Or from...)  Romney wavers on wavers and shoots Romneyfair or care in the foot.  How high is the cow pie?  Or maybe the real word is "works". The right implication is that Romney and the Federal Government would dictate what works.  Could he trickle down any philosophy more?  The pour won per cent[!]

* link and continued sentence 8-8-12
**image/cartoons

***

[Up Date: Tetra Heed Run ? Or Try Angle ?]

 NOTE: Charts of Sorts.

Here we go again...

another "Tragedy". 

Pardon my skepticism or sarcasm,
or attempt to make light of the dark side.

A Triangle

Bermuda Try Angle
A Victim of Teapublican Policies, Carl Gibson**
The Collapse of the Climate Change Contrarians, Juan Cole*
Ludicrous Times Op-Ed Forgets Entire Year of Wall Street History, Matt Taibbi

Certainly a triangle of skeptics.

*A foundation of skeptics:  based on perspectivism of Voodoo.
[I have only fully read the Cole piece.]
** previous pieces

[Nail in the coffin of so-called "Obama Economy".]

[8-8-12 Retro sort of.  Knot ing ham.]

Literary Hero Passes

Gore Vidal:  Not that I have heroes,
he was the hero of some friends
and I guess nemesis of the opposition.

Segue*: MSNBC Wrong Knee
PoliticsNation Healthcare for Women
MorningJoe- Poll land for Romney?
TheLastWord LaTourette's Sin Drone
RachelMaddow Women's Healthcare
TheEdShow  Repeal
Hardball International Raw Money
MorningJoe Mitt Clinton


8-2-12 AM1090 Forum:
Norman Goldman & Don Siegelman

MSNBC "take my word 4 it"
Morning Joe: Chicken Fight**
Rachel Maddow Deadly Republicans ***
Politics Nation
& Hard Ball

* Not exactly (less exactly)
** TheLastWord
*** TheEdShow
[investigation]

8-8-12
Guest Book: 
In Memoriam
et al. 
Bah zing uh ?

Braking Emale[!]

Consult* a  Congress ...person?


[!]= (sic) sarcasm / irony
[earlier two read]
Ribble:  What a Lefty Rush might have said about congressional testimony on the subject?
[Talk about a fluke: sorry to mix a ribble with real news.]
* actual most current email

[8-1-12:  Belated ** Fluke or Not ?  My original intent centered on one of two organizations, which I hoped to touch upon.  With irony I let the ribble rest in immodest irreverence.  The answer to my riddle is something I would not have put it past Gore Vidal to answer, but I will go no further than my hint in comment.]

** Nexus of tortured rhetoric : Not to be a Lefty Rush.

A Tax is Attacks?

Of course off course.
And doing just fine? 

Re-Coop?

Building a new hen house or egg heading?*
Is
badge
dough
M
toxic
?

(!?) above (? !)

* this is the point (pre-Hint) I wound back to
(to**)insert links in this line, post-verticle ramble.(***)

Hint:  There is a method to this B.S. (!?)

[bottom lines]

[Seg Way (not exactly){Ctrl F "branches"}:
Thom Hartmann simul-post."Stock pile voters"!]

**7-27-12 (edit) & note admission in yesterday's comment
*** 7-27-12 The important thing in the missing link (see comment 1) is that I selected the indicated links from some b.s. to log them for future reference not to form the vertical sentence from their first word or letter.(see * &**)

[7-27-12 Post comments 1&2: If there is anything that matters in the process above, here may be what anti-matters. Not to pun on serious matters.]

Aurora Shooting Update

Aurora Shooting Update* :

Update and effect on campaigns.
(label)

Today it looks like Mike Papantonio will be ranting** on hate and the nexus to violence.  These are not exactly nuanced or non-inciteful, nor linked to today's Ed Schultz Show.(The Ring of Fire links{"hate" and "nexus"}are not associated with The Ed Schultz{radio"wegoted"}Show, MSNBC*** or Rachel Maddow, nor fully viewed by me.)

NorMan GoldMan - A Smart Alex[!]

*link has nuanced follow-up(&scrollup) re:"under...standing"
** not intended as negative term
*** best wishes to Wendy Schultz

[!] not to link NorMan or BaldWin to ALEC, but Get Smart to Raw Money.

Fear and Running

in the Republican Party. 
It could be said that the 1st Amendment of the constitution kills more than the 2nd Amendment.

Amendment 1-  Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Amendment 2-  A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

I was going to go with "gunning" instead of "running", but I did not want it to suggest* a 2nd Amendment solution.  But with Romney running on an ad that misunderstands English, that is only one bullet point to my argument.  "You didn't build that." is completely out of context**.  But out of context does not necessarily mean misleading.*** 

Post asterisks:  The impact of the first amendment on what gets done has more impact on life and death than the fallacy that anyone is going to kill the second amendment.[**]

* b.s. (blog search) to be footnoted
** (no pun on con text but I need to replace[*] the Daily Rundown links)
*** not to suggest (not exactly)
[*] close enough for blog work
[**] There are very constitutional reasons for the political calculus of this rhetoric to influence and create reality.  But from another dimention, NorMan GoldMan has a rhetorical rant (not not it) that could fit Romney's rhetorical style in a silly Obama ad that could decimate [***] the Romney race.
[***] Pardon the Palin term, but not her.

[Post bracketed asterisks: regarding the NG rant, "that" is not quite "it" but on target, in more ways than one.  But in appreciation of the nature of our progress, it is not about any new legislation.  It is not about obliterating the constitution or its amendments or even new amendments.  Old taxes and legislation are always on the table, for all three branches of government, and the people are the deciders. C-heading and lede!]

[Follow-up of sorts.  But first a note on "gunning" as a rhetorical term.  I'm sorry I can't give proper credit, but it may be embedded in the links above.  However, Lawrence O'Donnell, noting the Brian Williams interview of Romney was not my original follow-up, but may be on target (That is not a course.) Ouch.  Guns don't kill people, people do.  Find them(Ctrl F)? What about the law?  Not for the silly season, or gatlin salad?  And oh no, not atTax of the meta4rhetoric.  I really think there is a problem with the use of Senator Thelma for Patty Murray, since she puts Boehnor at the wheel.]
[Transparency Destroyed?]
[Re-sorts of sorts... sort of, or not, of course.  This was basically an exercise in logging some clips of some MSNBC shows.]

[My best to Wendy & Ed Schultz!]

[7-26-12: update and effect (label)]
[Scroll up to "Post bracketed"]

Rachel Maddow

Talk Me Down [!]

Iron Knee ?

More than zFacts.

Depth Charts *.
More ** comment and context later.

(s.o.l. #318*)

(s.o.l. #450*)

(s.o.l. #450* embedded )

*Scroll over links to reference charts.

[format explanation: charts not in order of links]

** more than zParty or z-Politics

"Feel the Love"?

Anger Management.
Caution:  Who you talkin' to?

Too often it is the case in my blogging that I make cultural leaps without fully reading articles. 
Example:  Tan Gent to BaneOr**   
But maybe my GPS Cross Rhodes*** process depends too much upon or may not consider sufficiently a diversity of understanding.  Here I may have perfectly expressed the dilemma/dynamics of rhetorical progress.  To bring it back to Earth, con descend shun is not pretty.  Well, not exactly...
At least I did read the link I am now not paraphrasing*.  My point is that I hope that it is read, but with caution and consideration for whom it tolls. 

*  note that the heading and lede line are referenced in the link, my not paraphrasing is a perspecitivizing. (caution scrolling over as well, some may choose not to bother with the other asterisks, BUT choose well to read the link.)

(PLEASE READ the full text of my post before bothering with asterisks or scroll overs)
** not to associate with the persons or perspectives
***  the pun stops where ?

(Follow-up: Specious and Spacious Species ofor Iron Knee[!])
[Look who's talkin'?  (To be referenced later.)]

[7-26-12: update and effect (label) also re:"understanding"]

Tragedy in Aurora

First reports of a theater shooting in Aurora Colorado.(Dark Knight Rising) 
Campaigns suspended.
Same here.
Ahhh... Heck! ?

[Not that I want to go there**, but have I been there before ?]*

* Bracketed links added post construction of sentence.  Last 4words excepted.
** followed * closely (later)

[Not Quite ?]

[7-23-12 The post here precedes this follow up of sorts, for your digestion: Specious and Spacious Species.]
[7-26-12:  update and effect (label)]

"you people..."?

Skirting the dignity. 

Ann Romney claims it is below* the dignity of the President for his campaign to follow the money. 
"beneath his dignity..."!?!?
We can't get beneath your dignity !
You can't handle the dignity.
Show me the dignity...
not the face of the down troddin'!

Know the difference between cause and affect, between foundational and founding, between digging and building.

[Lean Forward]
[MB Jonathan Capeheart Romney editing, which I would call Rumsfeldian die-a-log.]

[Hardball: Braking bad? "Bachmann-Beck Overdrive."   "It's not about the ad...": Flackery on Flackery.]

Enough puns on why they break their English.  It seems that the Romney's(or Republican's) cannot afford be honest about how the economy works, let alone the immigration and emmigration of their beliefs**.

* more awkward English?

** "trickle down anyone"?

Not to Follow-Up...

...Or Down*
But that's the ticket.

While I did read the 2nd link, I have only glanced at the Sorkin critique and I am surprised at the criticism for the creator of Newsroom.  Not an HBO subscriber, I only saw the first episode OnDemand and was very impressed with the whole deal.  I don't know if I will have the same perspective of Alex Pereene if I could have seen the later episodes. Not that I was that impressed or critical of him to begin with. I thought he was fair and balanced, but not in the way it has come to be taken.  This actually this does follow from my not going that far and how some get** where they are.

My second line will be more fully digested later, and provide more fair and balanced context.

* actually it might follow(the only piece I have fully digested)
** BaneOr Side Show
*** anachronistic irony (I Ron Knee, Iron Knee of Bowles-Simpson/Balanced Solution)
[The Romney Tax problem is a sideshow so that they can say that Obama won't talk about the economy.  Republicans have been unprecedented obstuctionists so they can run against*** the economy, rather than the choice between more change and turning around to go back to what took us down.  Now that is a follow up.]

I wouldn't go that far.

On the verge of declaring that the CNBC motto should be Lean BackWords, (I did use the term Fauxword), it is interesting how the words(** )play out.
[AM OC "DNC Uses Dressage Horse to Hit Romney on Tax Returns." Hiding behind the skirt of the issues.  Jeb Bush continues the Lyin' Eyesin'.]
But how far should one go? Not* that I was starting from there.**

*the Jansing&Co links aren't there yet
** Oops maybe I was.
(Note anachronism of asterisks-adjusted.)

[Here is where it started and how far will it go? See AM above.]
[This post needs some serious footnoting***. Re: Labels.]

*** V-8?  [under RNP (viii) links are being sourced re: labels and oops, I have a heckuva lot under construction.]

[Post Roman numerals is The Cycle & "It Takes a Village", and understanding(Bane) more than exceptionalism. Mean while... speaking of Hoover. (para-phrasing meta-ramble)The former president on Fame & Power, a puppet in the headlights or swamp gas? Blast from the past, MED or Axis of Awesome, Reign on Parade of Rove 'n Nordquist.  Hal-C-on days?]

[Re:NorMan GoldMan Show (my)comment below, oops, maybe it is hyper-bully?  Speaking of shows, a technical glitch makes his first hour a veil able. (Featuring Third Party candidate and Morman on Romney. Speaking of dissin'genius.]

"enterpreneurs are special"

Get this* straight, I am not playing on words or the specially abled.  Nor am going to cast all enterpreneurs as some of the best business leaders.  But has  Maria Bartiromo been noted** for her distortion today?  How many small businesses can succeed without knowing "this" from "that"? Probably between 75 & 94%.*** Or they can get a job hosting or contributing to CNBC.

* this was today where they misunderstood President Obama's "that"
** that was yesterday [7-18-12 Maria Bartiromo links updated including bold added]
*** But that would be only if I was limited to their resources.(Chamber of Commerce)

[Would Rasmussen do a poll, how many Chamber of Commerce members know "this" from "that"?  Already 75% to 94% don't know how the Obama care would affect them.]
[7-18-12 NOW with Slap-in-Face? "If I'm Rubber You're Glue."]

EMP

Experience Message Project
Not Experience Mitt Project

In Seattle there is Paul Allen's Experience Music Project but last night (or as I hit snooze this AM) while it has escaped me now, my project was more "fair and balanced".  Something about red, blue and purple, not to joke* about dreams. Experienced Medium Project was not what I was going for, but may be the way I roll.**

*Ctrl F "green"
** Roman Numberal Pages (label added).
[Scroll over for hints, Nav &*** need updates.]

[ Re: Cycle ? The Cycle (undated?)]

7-17-12 Perspectiv-ism  (Not fully read yet.)
Dog Whistles ! Not (Nerdlandy Exceptionalism) So Cheap Trick [!] ? [!] (Or the Blue Badge of Courage.)[Raw Money and Pawlenty?]
[ The Real(B) Smoking Gun(A) ?  CNBC guest and host, don't get America, Obama or English.  "That" is not "it"! Obama did not say that they did not build thier businesses, they did not build the roads.  Well, they did but, we paid for them. And today Romney showed that 75%(or plays down 94%) of the Chamber of Commerce don't get economics either.]
[A. Maria Bartiromo and her guest cannot be so obtuse or are they deliberately distorting what the President said. "That" is not "it", means that the President meant they did not build the infrastructure not their businesses. B.  And former Senator Sununu is really blowing smoke, the better his message not be seen for how wrong it is.]

The Buck Stops Where?

Bane or* Entanglement. 

* This Week (his story?)

Romney Rolls On Bain Or...

Bane of Change: Faces five networks.
[Late Update]